Software & Systems · Story 8

A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Massive Data Center Instead / In 1999, a farmer gave away 87 acres of land to a small Texas town to use as a park. The town sold it to a data center developer for $10 million.

A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Massive Data Center Instead / In 1999, a farmer gave away 87 acres of land to a small Texas town to use as a park. The town sold it to a data center developer for $10 million.
Image via r/technology

In 1999, a Texas farmer donated 87 acres to the City of Taylor for a public park. The city recently sold the land to a data center developer for $10 million, replacing a community green space with a 135,000-square-foot data center.

This story highlights the tension between local community interests and the booming data center industry, and raises questions about the reliability of promises made by municipal governments regarding donated land.

Key details

  • The land was deeded to the City of Taylor, Texas, in 1999 for $10 with the condition it be used as a public park.
  • In 2025, the city sold the 87 acres to Blueprint, a data center developer, for $10 million.
  • The planned data center will be 135,000 square feet and located 500 feet from Pamela Griffin's home.
  • The Griffin family had used the land for generations for recreation, including baseball and camping.

Discussion angles

  • Many commenters argue that the sale proves local government cannot be trusted to honor donor intentions without legal protections like conservation easements.
  • A popular point is that the phrase 'great for the future' often means the deal benefits politicians and developers while harming existing residents.
  • Several users suggest that the politicians who enabled the sale were personally compensated, reflecting a broader distrust of municipal decision-making.
  • Commenters compare the situation to past government failures, such as telecom companies receiving funds to build infrastructure but not delivering.

Top comments

Commenters expressed anger and distrust, arguing that the sale shows government cannot be trusted with donations and that politicians benefit while residents lose. Many advised using legal protections like conservation easements to prevent such outcomes.

It's amazing how often "great for the future" ends up meaning "terrible for the people who already live there."
u/ArgentineBeauty · 7,258 score
Not everyone. All the politicians who enable this were compensated handsomely.
u/Skidpalace · 2,142 score
notes to self “Don’t trust the government”
u/goliath1515 · 911 score
If you ever do something like this, you have to lock the land up in a trust with a strict conservation easement. The second you hand a clean deed over to a city council, they just see an empty piggy bank waiting to be filled....
u/pomidorka2844 · 840 score
Remember that time we donated a shit ton of money to telecom companies to build a better fiber optic network all over the country? I say donate because they never did anything and we never got that money back, so I hardly think we can call it a purchase or...
u/AvailableReporter484 · 808 score